Benchmarking Supplier Emissions Across the Palm Oil Value Chain

About

Across Southeast Asia, deforestation linked to oil palm expansion remains a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and presents a material risk to corporate climate commitments. To improve climate accountability and strengthen supplier engagement, a spatially explicit assessment was conducted to quantify land use change (LUC) emissions associated with oil palm sourcing across Southeast Asia. The project establishes a robust, long-term emissions baseline aligned with the GHG Protocol, supporting both historical reporting and forward-looking risk management across the palm oil value chain.

The Challenge

Accurately quantifying deforestation-related emissions within complex palm oil supply chains involves several key challenges:

  • LIMITED HISTORICAL VISIBILITY

    Many suppliers lack consistent, long-term land use records, constraining the ability to assess historical deforestation impacts and emissions trends over time.

  • COMPLEX EMISSIONS ACCOUNTING

    Land use change emissions vary significantly depending on forest type, peat presence, and land conversion practices. This requires spatially explicit, science-based modelling to estimate location specific commodity-based emission factors (GHG emissions per unit of commodity produced).

  • SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKING

    Without standardized, location-specific emissions data, it is difficult to benchmark individual suppliers against regional or provincial averages and identify higher-risk sources within the value chain.

Methodology

The project developed a spatially explicit time series spanning more than 20 years of direct Land Use Change (dLUC) emissions resulting from forest-to-oil palm conversion. The analysis integrates traceability data with concession boundaries, sourcing areas, and historical land cover and land cover change datasets dating back to 2001.

Land use change commodity-based emission factors are calculated over a 20-year retrospective period ending in the reporting year (for example, 2003–2022 for a 2022 reporting cycle). Emissions occurring within this window are allocated to the reporting year using linear discounting, producing a weighted annual emissions profile consistent with GHG Protocol guidance.

The assessment focuses exclusively on direct LUC emissions from forest-to-palm conversion and includes the following carbon pools:

  • Aboveground forest biomass
  • Belowground forest biomass
  • Dead organic matter
  • Soil carbon

The analysis incorporates multiple greenhouse gas sources, including:

  • CO₂ emissions from deforestation
  • CH₄ and N₂O emissions from biomass burning
  • Emissions from peat drainage and peat burning
  • Soil organic carbon losses
  • Soil nitrogen mineralization

Total LUC emissions are converted into commodity-specific emission factors using estimated palm oil production in the reporting year. Production estimates are derived from the area available for cultivation and commodity-specific yield rates. Spatial analytics, boundary data for areas of interest, and land cover datasets are integrated to support this analysis.

Outcome

The assessment delivers a comprehensive, supply shed emissions baseline across Southeast Asia, enabling organizations to:

  • Conduct historical analysis of supplier emissions trends over more than 20 years, with formal LUC reporting for recent years
  • Quantify forward-looking carbon liabilities associated with past deforestation
  • Benchmark individual suppliers against provincial average emissions performance

By integrating traceability data, geospatial intelligence, and long-term land cover datasets, the project provides credible and auditable emissions insights to support climate reporting, supplier engagement, and deforestation-free sourcing strategies at scale.

Scroll to Top